As you will have seen in the previous webinar, using the following structure, is a requirement and will enable you to address the requirements of the essay, and ensure you attend to each aspect of a critical evaluation which is what the essay requires.
Provides a clear overview of why the improvement project was needed that conveys to the reader the direction the assignment will take.
The aim/rationale of project are clearly described. This section mounts a convincing argument for the intervention. Initial audit/observation against a known standard, guidance or the literature Includes detail of the staffing and resources, project team, history of current practices and workplace readiness for this improvement is discussed.
The improvement strategy (intervention) is explained.  Discussion and analysis of stakeholders, engagement, implementation strategy for the intervention, analysis of barriers and obstacles and communication strategies are outlined and justified
Demonstrates understanding of how the intervention is/was evaluated or measured, includes discussion of evaluation method, clearly identifying what the intervention is being measured against. Evaluation method reflects the aims and objectives of the project.
Summarises and draws together the findings and outcomes of the project
There are another 20% of the marks taking the total to 100 for the quality of your evidence and expression.  See the marking grid on the previous page to understand how these sections are assessed.


Click Here To Download  

The post EVALUATION appeared first on AssignmentHub.


Approximately 250 words